In January, the FBI arrested Rosemary Sauter-Frett, also known as Rosemary Sauter, a realtor accused of fleeing the U.S. Virgin Islands to escape prosecution for embezzlement. She had been on the run for nearly four years.

Now 62 years old, Sauter allegedly fled the Virgin Islands in February 2010 after checks began to bounce in connection with escrow accounts she used during real estate transactions. Her disappearance prompted the Virgin Islands Attorney General’s Office to issue a warrant for her arrest, and eight months later, the U.S. Attorney General’s Office also issued a federal arrest warrant. Reports issued at the time claimed that she had taken with her nearly $3 million, which was removed from accounts her clients had placed in her care.

Police found Sauter living in an apartment in Fallbrook, a suburban area near San Diego, California, after the FBI’s San Diego office received a tip from another office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The warrant for Sauter’s arrest charged her with violation of unlawful flight to avoid prosecution. She did not resist arrest and is currently being held at the Metropolitan Correction Center, a federal prison in San Diego.

Prior to her disappearance, Sauter was a successful real estate agent, with the largest realty office in St. Thomas. In addition to her real estate office, she also operated an accounting firm and a restaurant/bar, and was the former president of the V.I. Territorial Board of Realtors and the St. Thomas Board of Realtors.

Sauter was arraigned on Monday, February 3 in San Diego’s federal court on a charge of fleeing to avoid prosecution. She has since been jailed without bail and faces another federal court date soon.

It’s believed that Sauter embezzled substantial monies from her customers, who believed their money was being securely held in a RE/MAX Dreams Properties escrow account, before she fled the U.S. Virgin Islands. Overall, she is accused of absconding with more than $3 million of her fellow investors’ and clients’ money. She faces charges of grand larceny, which is the theft of high-valued personal property, and embezzlement, or the theft of funds that have been placed in another person’s care. She is also accused of obtaining money using false pretenses.

The territorial and federal documents detailing her exact charges are sealed, however, and it is unclear whether they will be released at any point in the near future. Sauter will most likely be extradited to the U.S. Virgin Islands for prosecution.

This case demonstrates the need for individuals and business owners to be extra diligent when escrowing substantial monies in a business transaction. Inquire if the company or individual has professional liability insurance or a fidelity bond. If you have any questions or would like a second opinion on a real estate legal issue, speak with an attorney.

BoltNagi is a widely respected and established real estate law firm serving clients throughout the U.S. Virgin Islands.

When plaintiffs in auto accident cases approve an offer for damages from defendants or their insurance companies, they will likely be obligated to accept the terms, even if new information arises. On January 15, the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands issued an opinion stating that the plaintiff in a recent lawsuit cannot challenge a settlement originally agreed upon with the auto insurance provider GEICO. 

Continue Reading Superior Court Rules in Favor of Defendant to Enforce Settlement Agreement

As Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives prepare to release their policies for immigration reform in the coming days, lawmakers, immigration reform advocates and individuals close to the issue are straining for details. 

Continue Reading Uncertainty Looms as Congress Addresses Immigration Reform

A recent opinion issued by the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands offers a good example of a directed verdict and how it can lead to more efficient resolutions to wrongful termination lawsuits that do not contain sufficient evidence.

Continue Reading Recent Superior Court Opinion Affirms Use of Directed Verdict in Wrongful Termination Suits

The Plaintiffs, three taxi drivers, appealed the dismissal of their Amended Complaint alleging that Special Agents of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) McDonald, Riley, and Chow ("ICE Agents”) violated their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. 

Continue Reading Immigration Sting Brings Claims of Civil Rights Violations

A judge may allow a party leave to amend a pleading, in some cases to add facts or to clarify an issue.  The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently heard a case where a plaintiff was given a chance to amend his complaint, but not a second.

Continue Reading Leave to Amend a Complaint not Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights

Res Judicata means "the thing decided." This basic rule embedded in our court system means that a final judgment on the merits of the case by a court with jurisdiction is deemed to be conclusive between the parties as to all matters that were litigated or that could’ve been litigated in that lawsuit. As the District Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands recently decided, this also applies to administrative rulings that are decided on an issue.

Continue Reading U.S. Virgin Islands Judge Says Administrative Rulings are Final

A case stemming from the use of a right of way on commercial property in St. Thomas. In November of 2000, Parcel No. 14 Estate Contant was divided into four parcels.  Parcel No. 14A was purchased by Gejan, Inc., Parcel No. 14B was purchased by Hubert King, and Parcel No. 14C was purchased by Alexius Perkins.   Parcel No. 14D was granted to the three as tenants in common to use as a private right of way.   

Continue Reading Easement not Easy for St. Thomas Companies to Interpret

A court’s decision denying summary judgment on the defense of qualified immunity is considered to be a final judgment.  It can be appealed immediately to the extent that the denial turns on an issue of law. However, an appellate court doesn’t have jurisdiction to review that decision if an interlocutory (or interim decision before the case is concluded) appeal turns on issues of fact. The Third Circuit recently looked at this issue in the context of a terminated government employee and the defense of qualified immunity.

Continue Reading Qualified Immunity Turns on Policy Making Authority